← All governors
DB
North Dakota•In office since 2016•Party: R
Doug Burgum
Serving as Governor of North Dakota since 2016. Evaluation based on verified public data.
Overall GradeA-
75.7 / 100
Ranked #10 of 50 nationally
Category
Economy
72.7 / 100B+
Unemployment RateA+
2.0%
National avg 3.9%
Rank 2 of 5099 pct
Trend since took officefrom 2.6%
Median Household IncomeB+
$73,959
National avg $74,580
Rank 21 of 5059 pct
Trend since took officefrom $60,557
Job GrowthB-
3.5%
National avg 5.5%
Rank 35 of 5032 pct
Trend since took officefrom 1.5%
Real GDP GrowthB
6.0%
National avg 8.0%
Rank 28 of 5045 pct
Trend since took officefrom 2.0%
Real Wage GrowthB
2.8%
National avg 3.0%
Rank 29 of 5044 pct
Trend since took officefrom 1.0%
Category
Fiscal Health
67.8 / 100B+
State Debt per CapitaB-
$2,200
National avg $3,580
Rank 22 of 5058 pct
Trend since took officefrom $2,400
Rainy Day FundC
12.0%
National avg 14.0%
Rank 41 of 5018 pct
Trend since took officefrom 10.0%
State & Local Tax BurdenA-
8.8%
National avg 11.2%
Rank 6 of 5090 pct
Trend since took officefrom 9.0%
Credit RatingA+
100
National avg 90
Rank 12 of 5079 pct
Trend since took officefrom 100
Category
Quality of Life
58.3 / 100B-
Poverty RateB
10.5%
National avg 11.5%
Rank 15 of 5071 pct
Trend since took officefrom 10.7%
High School Graduation RateB+
89.8%
National avg 87.0%
Rank 12 of 5078 pct
Trend since took officefrom 88.0%
Life ExpectancyC
77.3 yrs
National avg 77.5 yrs
Rank 25 of 5052 pct
Trend since took officefrom 77.7 yrs
Violent Crime RateC
283 / 100k
National avg 380 / 100k
Rank 17 of 5068 pct
Trend since took officefrom 242 / 100k
Bridges in Poor ConditionB-
4.8%
National avg 6.6%
Rank 20 of 5062 pct
Trend since took officefrom 5.0%
How this grade is built
Each metric gets two scores: how the state ranks among all 50 states (60%) and how much it changed under this governor (40%). These combine into a 0–100 score per metric, averaged within three pillars — Economy, Fiscal Health, Quality of Life — then curved across the cohort so grades spread A–F.
Full methodology →