Methodology

How we grade.

The composite formula

Every governor receives a single A+ to F grade. Each metric is scored 0–100 by blending two sub-scores:

  • 60% — Cohort Rank. Where does the state rank against all 50 states on this metric? The best state scores 100, the worst scores 0, the median scores 50. Same rule applies to every metric regardless of unit or scale.
  • 40% — Trend During Tenure. Has the metric improved or declined since the governor took office? A ±25% change during tenure spans the full 0–100 range. Metrics already at a natural ceiling (e.g. a perfect credit rating) get full credit for being maintained.

Per-metric scores are averaged within three pillars — Economy, Fiscal Health, Quality of Life — which are then weighted equally to form the composite. No regional peer adjustment, no separate national-average benchmark: a single, transparent 60/40 split.

The letter scale

Final composite scores are curved across the full cohort of 50 governors so the leaderboard spreads cleanly from A to F instead of bunching at B and C. The curve centers the cohort at a B-/C+ and stretches the distribution so the best and worst performers are clearly distinguishable. Category sub-scores on each governor's profile remain uncurved — they reflect raw performance against benchmarks.

A
75–100
Well above benchmarks
B
57–74
Above average
C
42–56
About average
D
30–41
Below average
F
0–29
Well below benchmarks

Metrics in v1

Fourteen metrics across three categories. Each category contributes equally to the overall grade — so adding more metrics to one pillar won't dilute the others.

Economy

Unemployment Rate
Lower is betterBureau of Labor Statistics
Median Household Income
Higher is betterUS Census ACS
Job Growth (during tenure)
Higher is betterBLS nonfarm payrolls
Real GDP Growth (during tenure)
Higher is betterBureau of Economic Analysis
Real Wage Growth (during tenure)
Higher is betterBLS QCEW

Fiscal Health

State Debt per Capita
Lower is betterTax Foundation / Pew
Rainy Day Fund (% of general fund)
Higher is betterPew Charitable Trusts
State + Local Tax Burden (% of income)
Lower is betterTax Foundation
Credit Rating (S&P, 0–100 scale)
Higher is betterS&P Global Ratings

Quality of Life

Poverty Rate
Lower is betterUS Census ACS
High School Graduation Rate
Higher is betterNCES
Life Expectancy
Higher is betterCDC NCHS
Violent Crime Rate (per 100k)
Lower is betterFBI UCR
% of Bridges in Poor Condition
Lower is betterFederal Highway Administration

All metrics carry equal weight within their category. Categories are then weighted equally in the overall composite.

What we don't grade on

Party affiliation, social positions, campaign rhetoric, endorsements, scandals, and media coverage are deliberately excluded. We also exclude subjective leadership traits — policy implementation, ethics, transparency, and crisis management — because any score we assigned would be editorial judgment rather than measured outcome. We grade only on quantifiable results a governor's administration can directly influence.

Limitations

  • Federal policy and global economics affect every state — we don't perfectly isolate executive impact.
  • Data lags 6–18 months for most metrics. We mark the as-of date on each value.
  • Short tenures (under 2 years) have less reliable trend signal.
  • v1 covers governors only. Mayors and other officials are on the roadmap.